Archive for April, 2018


My first ever attempt at a Mock Draft. Now I realize why I never even thought about doing one; once you get into the teens onward, it’s fairly hard to predict. I am not taking trades into account; though I will say what teams I feel may trade up or down. I am just going pick by pick as the order currently stands. Picks are based on what I think a team should do and what I think they will do. But in most cases it will be what I think they should do with the pick based on positional need and value.

  1. Browns – Sam Darnold; QB, USC. Darnold is the best QB in the draft, and with Tyrod Taylor in place there won’t be an overwhelming cry for Darnold to start Day 1. For once the Browns have actually set themselves up smartly. Let’s be honest, Browns fans aren’t expecting much in terms of on field success in 2018. Everyone’s eyes are on the future, and nobody is expecting greatness out of Taylor, but he is a serviceable QB who took a fledgling team to the playoffs last year. And the more important thing, he will keep Darnold from being thrown into the fire and possibly failing because of it. As so many Browns QBs have.
  2. Giants – Josh Allen; QB, Wyoming. Lots of people find this the most intriguing spot in the entire draft. There are lots of ways the Giants can go here; take the best player on the board in Saquan Barkley, who can help them win now. Take much needed offensive line help, take the best pass rusher in the draft in Bradley Chubb or they could even be tempted to trade down given an overwhelming offer. Then there is the Odell Beckham Jr. trade bait lingering out there, who if traded, will change the landscape of the entire draft, not just what the Giants do. The Giants shouldn’t be picking this high in the draft, ever. And they need to take advantage of this opportunity to find Eli Manning’s successor. Yes, they took Davis Webb in the draft last year, but since they opted to start Geno Smith over him when Eli was benched, that shows they don’t have much faith in Webb. Josh Allen probably has the most upside of any of the QBs in the draft. He has things that can’t be taught and the few things he needs to work on can be easily taught. Learning under Eli will take Allen to the next level. And Allen’s big arm will play well in the NFC East, especially the Meadowlands. If they don’t take a QB here and take say Barkley here, and helps them win, get into the playoffs but don’t reach the Super Bowl, it will actually set the Giants back as they will have to find their future QB working with a late pick in the first round.
  3. Jets – Josh Rosen; QB, UCLA. If the Jets had their hearts set on one specific QB they would’ve, or let’s put it this way; should have, traded up higher than the third pick (from 6th overall mind you). With Rosen being the best available QB left on the board the Jets are a logical landing spot for him. The Jets are in a similar position as the Browns; having a transition QB in place so whoever they take in the draft doesn’t have to start Day 1. They have even more insurance with the signing of Teddy Bridgewater, who showed flashes of greatness in Minnesota before destroying his knee in training camp two years ago. Bottom line is the Jets need to find the franchise QB they’ve sorely been missing for what seems like forever.
  4. Browns – Saquan Barkley; RB, Penn State. One of the bigger question marks in the draft is what will the Browns do at #4. There are lots of roads they can take here; much like the Giants at #2. With Barkley still available I don’t see how you can pass on him. The only reason you don’t take him is because you don’t want to invest a pick this high on a running back. But this route clearly paid off for the Jaguars last year, as they went from one of the worst teams in the league to making the AFC Championship game. Bradley Chubb will be awfully tempting here though.
  5. Broncos – Denzel Ward; CB, Ohio State. The Broncos need to replace Aqib Talib, and Ward is the best corner in the draft. The only reason I see why Denver traded Talib and eat $1 million is because they would target Ward in the draft, especially considering how little return they got for him. Denver tolerated Talib’s off the field issues so that is not a likely reason for the trade of a guy still under contract of for another two years and wasn’t pushing for an extension. With all that said, I could see Denver trading down to a team wanting to move up to take a QB. And they could take advantage of one of those teams to stockpile picks, as Denver has a lot of needs.
  6. Colts – Quenten Nelson; G, Notre Dame. Bottom line here is the Colts need to do a better job protecting Andrew Luck. They have too much invested in him, and when healthy he has one of the best arms in the league. Nelson is the best offensive lineman in the draft, let alone guard. They already traded down once, and I wouldn’t put it past them to trade down again to stock pile even more picks to help plug all the holes in their roster. Especially if there is a team out there desperate enough for a QB or is in love with Baker Mayfield should he still be available.
  7. Buccaneers – Bradley Chubb; DE, N.C. State. The Bucs will be thrilled that Chubb falls to them here. Yes, they traded for Jason Pierre-Paul, but you can’t pass on a talent like Bradley Chubb, the top pass rusher in the draft. I thought about them selecting Minkah Fitzpatrick here simply because of his versatility.
  8. Bears – Minkah Fitzpartrick; S, Alabama Derwin James; S, Florida St. Facing the likes of Aaron Rodgers, Matthew Stafford and now Kirk Cousins twice a year will force the Bears to get better in the secondary. With Fitzpatrick still available, and the fact that he can play all over the secondary, it’s a no brainer for the Bears.
  9. 49ers – Marcus Daveport; DE, UTSA. San Francisco needs to rebuild the defense that got them to the Super Bowl in -, and for a defense towards the bottom in sacks last year, drafting the best available edge rusher is a good starting point on the path back to the quarterback. They need to get receiving help for Jimmy Garrapolo, but the ninth overall pick is too high to do it. There is enough receiver talent in this year’s draft that they can grab a receiver in the second round, and maybe if they’re lucky, land a first round talent in the second round
  10. Raiders – Roquan Smith; OLB, Georgia. There have been rumblings that the Raiders have been in discussions to trade out of the 10th overall pick. It wouldn’t surprise me if they do trade down, but to be honest I can’t see Jon Gruden passing up the opportunity here. Especially when Roquan Smith is still available. Watching the National Championship Game it seemed Gruden fell in love with Smith. The Raiders do need help at linebacker, so all the pieces of the puzzle fit.
  11. Dolphins – Vita Vea, DT, Washington.  To be quite honest, I have no idea where the Dolphins will go with this pick. They’re kind of in no man’s land here; they don’t need to waste a first round pick on a QB yet, too early to go after a tight end too, they don’t need help at inside linebacker so the best linebacker option is off the board for them, all the top corner talent is gone, and the top two edge rushers were already taken as well. People either love or hate Vea, at least in terms of a high first round pick. But considering all of the Dolphins’ options, he is the best pick here.
  12. Bills – Baker Mayfield, QB, Oklahoma. The Bills risked a lot by trading away their starting QB and not trading up higher in the draft than #12. But in the end they still get a QB without further mortgaging the future.
  13. Redskins – Tremaine Edmunds, ILB, Virginia Tech. With Vita Vea off the board, the best remaining defensive option is where Washington has to go here. The fact that they need to get younger at the linebacker position makes taking Edmunds here that much more sense.
  14. Packers – Harold Landry; DE, Boston College. The Packers are pretty well screwed here. If you thought the Dolphins were in no man’s land; the Packers are there but surrounded by land mines with dozens of hand grenades being lobbed their direction and barbed wire preventing their escape. They need so much defensive help, and by this pick all the top players at each position of desperate need, not just need, are already taken. Do they risk taking yet another corner with their first pick? Damarious Randal proved a bust and has been traded away after only two years in Green Bay. Everyone thought Kevin King was a steal at the top of the second round last year, but his play in 2017 leaves a lot to be desired. So I just can’t see Green Bay going after a corner with their first round pick. At least I hope not. So they resort to a typical Ted Thompson move (yes, I know TT is no longer the GM) by selecting Harold Landry, who is fresh off an ankle injury that cut his 2017 season short and prevented him from recapturing his dominant form from 2016. It’s a high risk/high reward pick, and a value pick as well. Had Landry put in a similar season in 2017 as he did in 2016 he would likely be a Top 5 pick.
  15. Cardinals – Calvin Ridley; WR, Alabama. The Cardinals need to find a replacement for Larry Fitzgerald because he can’t play forever (even though he looks like he will). Ridley is the best receiver in the draft, and picking at 15 is actually beneficial for Arizona. Yes, they should be looking for a quarterback of the future, but unless they trade up to get one taking one of the remaining QB’s here at 15 is not a smart decision. Arizona’s game plan should be to take Ridley here, and hope Mason Rudolph or Lamar Jackson fall to them in the second round. Possibly even trading up to get one of them.
  16. Ravens – Mike McGlinchey; OT, Notre Dame. The Ravens are yet another team that needs to start looking for their quarterback of the future. But it’s not here at #16. They’re in the same boat as Arizona. As is usual Baltimore needs more help on the offensive side than the defensive side, and the signing of Michael Crabtree takes them out of the market for a receiver in the first round. It’s still too early to take a tight end, which is another need for the Ravens. Considering they might need to do some re-shuffling along the offensive line, taking the best offensive tackle in the draft is not the flashy move fans might be looking for, but it’s the smart move.
  17. Chargers – Derwin James; S, Florida St.  At this point in the draft it seems like we’re hitting a bunch of teams that need to look for their future QB, but again, the Chargers are in the same boat as Arizona and Baltimore when it comes to this. They’re defensive front is pretty good but their secondary could use another playmaker.
  18. Seahawks – Josh Jackson; CB, Iowa. Seattle needs to replace Richard Sherman, and Jackson is the best available corner. UCF corner Mike Hughes might get some consideration here, but Jackson has better ball skills.
  19. Cowboys – D.J. Moore; WR, Maryland. It felt like everyone knew it was coming, but not this close to the draft. The release of Dez Bryant leaves the door open for Dallas to take a receiver in the first round. They just missed out on Calvin Ridley, who was picked four picks before Dallas went on the clock in my mock draft. I feel like Moore has more upside than SMU’s Cortland Sutton. And the fact that Moore put up the numbers he did at Maryland given the revolving door quarterback situation there proves he is a reliable pass catcher.
  20. Lions – Will Hernandez; G, UTEP. With all the best pass rushing options off the board by this point, the Lions will be forced to address another key need; improving their running game. But it won’t be by selecting a running back in the first round, they can do that later as after Saquan Barkley the running back crop falls off steeply. So Hernandez, a road grader at guard, is the smarter pick here.
  21. Bengals – Mike Hughes; CB, Colorado. Pacman Jones is gone (at least for now) so the Bengals need to find his replacement. Hughes is the best available corner after a run on corners in the first round.
  22. Bills – Da’Ron Payne; DT, Alabama. I could see Buffalo trading back here, as do many other people. But since I’m not including trades in my mock draft, I have to make a selection for Buffalo. And getting another piece for the defensive line is where I see them going here.
  23. Patriots – Kolton Miller; OT, UCLA. New England makes use of their first of two first round picks to solidify a pressing need after the departure of LT Nate Solder in free agency. Miller is one of, if not the most athletic tackles in the draft. He was moved from the right side to the left in his senior year, doing a more than ample job of protecting the golden boy Josh Rosen.
  24. Panthers – Courtland Sutton; WR, SMU. After the top two receivers went off the board before the Panther’s selection, it will increase their urgency to snag one here in the first round rather than wait. Carolina’s passing game can’t be one dimensional again with Christian McCaffrey coming out of the backfield, so they need a receiver. Between Courtland Sutton and the other best remaining receiver; Texas A&M’s Christian Kirk, Sutton gets the nod. Think of this as another Kelvin Benjamin.
  25. Titans – Arden Key; DE, LSU. Tennessee is in desperate need of pass rushers, and Key is the best available.
  26. Falcons – Taven Bryan; DT, Florida. Atlanta needs to fill a big hole in the interior of the defensive line with the departure of Dontari Poe in free agency. Bryan is best available.
  27. Saints – Hayden Hurst; TE, South Carolina. It was no secret the Saints wanted to sign Jimmy Graham in free agency. Since they missed out on him they turn to the best tight end in the draft; Hayden Hurst. He has a similar build to Graham, and with Drew Brees slinging the ball, there is a high ceiling for the former baseball star. Dallas Goedert will get some consideration here, as it’s a toss up to who the best tight end in the draft is. I would lean more towards Hurst, hence why I have him being picked here.
  28. Steelers – RaShann Evans – OLB, Alabama. The Steelers always seem to strike gold in the draft when selecting defensive guys. And outside linebacker is a need for Pittsburgh given the current situation of their linebacking corps.
  29. Jaguars – Isaiah Wynn; G, Georgia. The Jaguars need to keep building on their strengths, and last year that was clearly the running game. While Wynn played left tackle and left guard in college, but his build lends itself to the guard position in the NFL. But for the Jags’ it has to be a comfort knowing he can play on the outside in the toughest conference in college football and still be able to help the running game. Just look what Georgia running backs have done with Wynn along the offensive line.
  30. Vikings – Connor Williams; OL, Texas. The Vikings don’t have many holes; it’s why they’re picking this late in the first round. One of their weaknesses is along the offensive line, and Connor Williams is versatile enough to play anywhere and is capable of being a plug and play guy at tackle or guard. It’s why I have him marked down as an offensive lineman and not penciled in at guard or tackle. Some project him to be relegated to guard while others have him being a strong right tackle.
  31. Patriots – Mason Rudolph; QB, Oklahoma St. Their second of two first round picks gives New England some flexibility. Depending on how the board shapes up at this point, they may feel safe not selecting a quarterback here. To be perfectly honest here, I see them trading down with a team who wants to move up from early in the second round back into the first round. And with that early second round pick New England will take Mason Rudolph. Of late there has been lots of buzz about them liking Lamar Jackson, but it wouldn’t’ surprise me if that was misinformation purposely being sent out by the Patriots in order to have a team make a trade in order to draft Jackson before he falls to the Patriots. But since I am not predicting trades on this mock draft, I have New England taking their man, Mason Rudolph at this pick.

 

 

 

Advertisements

The Beatles – Mono Box Set

Posted: April 19, 2018 in Vinyl
Tags: ,

Starting in 2012 EMI/Apple Records started re-mastering the entire Beatles catalog. It marked the first time the bulk of their albums underwent a re-mastering in both mono and stereo. Two separate box sets were released, one in mono and one in stereo, along with all the albums being released individually on both formats. It presented the best opportunity for anyone to add the entire Beatles discography to their collection at a relatively inexpensive price, at the most optimal sound quality.

To even to least informed person, The Beatles are known to be not only one of the most popular acts, but one of the most collectible bands in history. And as such some of their albums and other assorted memorabilia can fetch a pretty penny. Original pressings of their albums can go for hundreds if not thousands of dollars, with various pressings between then and now selling for similar figures. Which brings me back to the affordability of these box sets, especially if you wanted to pick up their entire discography for whatever reason. It might not seem like $400 is affordable, but considering what you get with these box sets, and by sheer comparison to other purchase options out there, these box sets are a bargain.

Like I just stated, the original retail price of each version (mono or stereo) of the box sets was around $400; $450 for the stereo box and $375 for the mono box to be exact. With the mono box you get 11 albums and with the stereo box you get 14 albums. The difference in total between the box sets is due to some of the Beatles albums never being recorded in mono, which started with Yellow Submarine and took you through Abbey Road and Let It Be. On top of the albums, you get a rather large, or extremely large hard cover book. The book with the mono box is only 108 pages, while the book with the stereo box is 252 pages.

With this post I will focus on the mono box, which is the more popular box for a multitude of reasons. For the stereo box check here. When The Beatles formed in the early 60s the only recording option was monophonic, or mono, meaning one channel. In laymen’s terms, the sound only plays through one speaker. So if you have a sound system utilizing multiple speakers, the same audio will play through all the speakers in your set up, regardless if you have independent subwoofers, mids, tweeters, etc. So for the purists out there, and/or those who listened to The Beatles while their career was still active, the mono masters are the end all be all and the definitive example of their music.

Personally, I have no preference to either mono or stereo. Since I grew up with stereo, my ear will always have a bias towards that, but I can appreciate mono recordings. When you listen to a Beatles album and do a comparison between mono and stereo, you appreciate aspects in both formats. You notice things that either are there or aren’t there between each format, notice that some things just don’t work in stereo like they did in mono or find something interesting in the stereo master of an album originally recorded in mono.

For the mono box, the original packaging of all the albums was meticulous re-created. Also included is a small, folded insert explaining the re-mastering process used. It’s basically the same exact insert for all the mono albums, save for the album titled and track listing. Even the advertisement on the back of the insert is the same for all the mono albums. The ad is for The Beatles “Love” Cirque de Soleil show in Las Vegas, which is still being performed to this day The replication of the original packaging is yet another draw to this mono box set. If you still want an original pressing of any of their albums, more power to you, but this box set definitely makes everything more accessible to everyone.

Not only is the packaging for the mono box set amazing, the sound quality should be the biggest draw here. I have had the pleasure of doing a comparison between some of the original pressings and the records included with this box set, and it’s actually a tossup as to which sounds better. Granted the original pressings I listened to were not in mint condition, they have been extensively played over the years, but they were far from terrible condition. I’d probably grade them at VG.

If you read up on the mastering of these re-mastered box sets, they were done from the original master tapes, at Abbey Road Studios, referencing the original notes made by the engineer of each album, while being cut specifically for vinyl. Those facts are nothing we haven’t heard before, as the resurgence of vinyl has led to many albums be re-mastered, if for nothing else but to cash in on the aforementioned vinyl resurgence. But with that said, these Beatles re-masters seem different. There seems to be a genuine effort behind them, which is reflected in the sound presented on each album. One key difference that should be noted with the re-mastering job though, is that due to technological advances in the 50 odd years in some cases since some of the album’s original release, more substance has been revealed. I can say that, while subtle, there are some differences between the original masters and these current re-masters. In some instances it may just be as simple as having a crisper sound, while in others it’s like listening to the album for the first time all over again. Things like dynamic range are more pronounced. A clear delineation of vocals and rhythm are heard. Harmonies are more vibrant. And the layers of music come across more clear and precise.

Circling back to the packaging for the mono box, there are some key differences between the mono and stereo box that will help you tell the difference between them. Not like this is difficult to observe on your own, but I’m all about being as detailed as possible on this blog. The mono box is white, and has the title on the release/box as “The Beatles In Mono.” The stereo box is black, and makes no mention of “stereo” anywhere on the packaging. Other than the obvious color difference between them, that is one of the only difference between the two boxes. The only other difference is that the stereo box has the order of the items in the box printed on both sides of the box. This is something that is easier described in photos than words, which you can see in the post for the stereo box here.

Inside the mono box, which does not come shrink wrapped (the stereo box comes shrink wrapped as well) , two silicate packets are placed on top of contents of the box (records and book) along with foam padding. There is also foam padding placed vertically inside the box, in front of the records along the front of the box itself. It ships from the manufacturer in front of the records and book, but depending on how you want to store your box set, you could easily swap positions and e put the foam against the back wall of the box while putting the records and book in front of it. Aside from the foam, the box set comes from the manufacturer with records in front of the book. I would not recommend putting the book in front of the records under any circumstances. Even though the mono book is less than half the size of the stereo book, it still weighs quite a bit, and it’s not worth damaging the records to re-organize your box to put the book at the front. The records are organized chronologically inside the box, and the records do not come shrink wrapped. They do, however, come in re-sealable poly sleeves with a flap. The box itself opens from the top, with the lid remaining attached to the box. Each of the boxes, not just either the mono or stereo box, has a slip case cover. It’s not much, but there is a thin sleeve than slides over the top of the box, which is purely for hype/promo as it advertises the contents of the respective box on the back.

Because it’s been quite a few years since these box sets came out, prices are starting to drastically fall. As mentioned earlier in the entry, the original price for the stereo box was $450, coming out to roughly $ 32 per album without factoring in the price of the book or the box the records come in, which is an arbitrary price determined by the owner of the box. That original retail price falls in line with records being overpriced for a multitude of reasons. And they sold a good chunk of box sets when they first came out because there was a lot of hype around them, and plenty of demand too. But many boxes are still lingering to this day, though I’m not sure if they just kept on pressing them over the years.

I bought one copy of each of the box sets for a little under $135 shipped apiece. I bought them from a horrible merch company that is based in the UK but ships North American orders out of Canada, and I paid in Canadian Dollars, so the exchange rate was very much on my side. This was back in February 2017 during a ridiculous 50% off sale this merch company was running on box sets, and tack on an additional 15% off coupon code, and you wind up getting a $375 box set for $132.50.

My only gripe about both of these box sets, not just the mono or stereo box, is that neither of them come with download cards/codes. You think they would, especially in this day and age, but Apple Records / the surviving Beatles are notoriously greedy, and sadly it’s not surprising that they would want to make as much money as possible off these re-masters. And they somewhat succeed with that philosophy as you would have to buy their entire catalog again, either the digital downloads or the CD’s, in order to have the best quality MP3s of the songs. It’s a lame move on any label’s part, but since The Beatles were really taken advantage of earlier in their career when the rights to their music were literally sold out from underneath them, the tiniest bit of slack should be cut for them. The rights to The Beatles catalog was sold to Michael Jackson of all people. Figures that the one person who has/had more money than the Beatles, outbid them, for the rights to their own music.

The Beatles Stereo Box Set

Posted: April 17, 2018 in Vinyl
Tags: ,

Starting in 2012 EMI/Apple Records started re-mastering the entire Beatles catalog. It marked the first time the bulk of their albums underwent a re-mastering in both mono and stereo. Two separate box sets were released, one in mono and one in stereo, along with all the albums being released individually on both formats. It presented the best opportunity for anyone to add the entire Beatles discography to their collection at a relatively inexpensive price, at the most optimal sound quality.

To even to least informed person, The Beatles are known to be not only one of the most popular bands, but one of the most collectible bands in history. And as such some of their albums and other assorted memorabilia can fetch a pretty penny. Original pressings of their albums can go for hundreds if not thousands of dollars, with various pressings between then and now selling for similar figures. Which brings me back to the affordability of these box sets, especially if you wanted to pick up their entire discography for whatever reason. It might not seem like $400 is affordable, but considering what you get with these box sets, and by sheer comparison to other purchase options out there, these box sets are a bargain.

Like I just stated, the original retail price of each version (mono or stereo) of the box sets was around $400; $450 for the stereo box and $375 for the mono box to be exact. With the mono box you get 11 albums and with the stereo box you get 14 albums. The difference in total between the box sets is due to some of the Beatles albums never being recorded in mono, which started with Yellow Submarine and took you through Abbey Road and Let It Be. On top of the albums, you get a rather large, or extremely large hard cover book. The book with the mono box is only 108 pages, while the book with the stereo box is 252 pages.

With this post I will focus on the stereo box, which is the less popular box for a multitude of reasons. For the mono box check here. There are two different pressings/versions of the stereo box set, and one is far better than the other and more desirable as a result. There is a U.S. pressing and UK/European pressing. The Euro box is the one to go for. The U.S. pressing was plague with problems and pressing errors/defects that led to awful sound quality, which had many people actually return the U.S. stereo box sets. No idea what led to the total lack of quality control with the U.S. pressing, but the Euro pressing seemed to be free of these problems, or any problems in fact. Any sound issues with the Euro stereo box is down to the mastering done to a particular album, not any defects.

The easiest way to tell the difference between the two is that the UK/Euro pressing/version has a small black sticker on the shrink wrap, placed on the back of the box, which says “Packaged in USA Records Made in Germany.” Other than that sticker it’s impossible to ensure you have a Euro box prior to purchasing/opening. The bar codes on each pressing/version are identical, and even if you order from North America you might not get the U.S. pressing. I ordered from a horrible merch company that is based in the UK but ships North America orders out of Canada, and I received a copy from the Euro pressing. Aside from that aforementioned sticker, the Euro and U.S. pressing have different matrix numbers for every album in the box. But obviously you can’t see that before buying the box.

Personally, I have no preference to either mono or stereo. Since I grew up with stereo, my ear will always have a bias towards that, but I can appreciate mono recordings. When you listen to a Beatles album and do a comparison between mono and stereo, you appreciate aspects in both formats. You notice things that either are there or aren’t there between each format, notice that some things just don’t work in stereo like they did in mono or find something interesting in the stereo master of an album originally recorded in mono.

Unlike with the mono box, the original packaging of all the albums was not meticulous re-created for the stereo box. All the albums come shrink wrapped too, with a long black rectangle hype sticker on the top right corner, which did not happen in the mono box set. The hype stickers are pretty much identical for each album in the set, at least the basic design. They kept the layout/design uniform, which is a nice touch. Some albums in the stereo box come with different items compared to their mono box counterpart. Because the intention of the mono box was to be true to the original packaging, albums like Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band don’t come with an additional full color dust sleeve on card stock like the stereo box does. And the stereo box version of Beatles For Sale comes in a traditional gatefold jacket instead of the gatefold type jacket the mono box version comes in, which just has the thin cover fold open, leaving a traditional single pocket jacket behind it where the record slides in.

Another key difference with the records in the stereo box is that the Past Masters album is only a double LP, whereas in the mono box it’s a triple LP. As a result there is an extra panel on the mono box version, which has a tri-fold jacket instead of a traditional gatefold jacket like the stereo box version. Another difference with the Past Masters album is that the stereo box version comes with an insert and the mono box version does not. This insert has what is printed on the tri-fold jacket from the mono box version of Past Masters, all due to size constraints. Inside the gatefold jacket of the stereo box version is a black and white promo photo of the band.

Not only is the packaging for the stereo box set amazing, the sound quality should be the biggest draw here. I have had the pleasure of doing a comparison between some (not every album) of the original pressings and the records included with this box set, and it’s actually a tossup as to which sounds better. Granted the original pressings I listened to were not in mint condition, they have been extensively played over the years, but they were far from terrible condition. I’d probably grade them at VG.

If you read up on the mastering of these re-mastered box sets, they were done from the original master tapes, at Abbey Road Studios, referencing the original notes made by the engineer of each album, while being cut specifically for vinyl. Those facts are nothing we haven’t heard before, as the resurgence of vinyl has led to many albums be re-mastered, if for nothing else but to cash in on the aforementioned vinyl resurgence. But with that said, these Beatles re-masters seem different. There seems to be a genuine effort behind them, which is reflected in the sound presented on each album. One key difference that should be noted with the re-mastering job though, is that due to technological advances in the 50 odd years in some cases since some of the album’s original release, more substance has been revealed. I can say that, while subtle, there are some differences between the original masters and these current re-masters. In some instances it may just be as simple as having a crisper sound, while in others it’s like listening to the album for the first time all over again. Things like dynamic range are more pronounced. A clear delineation of vocals and rhythm are heard. Harmonies are more vibrant. And the layers of music come across more clear and precise.

Circling back to the packaging for the stereo box, there are some key differences between the mono and stereo box that will help you tell the difference between them. Not like this is difficult to observe on your own, but I’m all about being as detailed as possible on this blog. The mono box is white, and has the title on the release/box as “The Beatles In Mono.” The stereo box is black, and makes no mention of “stereo” anywhere on the packaging. Other than the obvious color difference between them, that is one of the only differences between the two boxes. The only other difference is that the stereo box has the order of the items in the box printed on both sides of the box on and the slip case that slides over top. This is something that is easier described in photos than words, which you can see in the post for the stereo box here.

Inside the stereo box, which comes shrink wrapped (the mono box does not come shrink wrapped) , one silicate packet is placed on top of contents of the box (records and book). There is also foam padding placed vertically inside the box, in front of the records along the front of the box itself. It ships from the manufacturer in front of the records and book, but depending on how you want to store your box set, you could easily swap positions and put the foam against the back wall of the box while putting the records and book in front of it. Aside from the foam, the box set comes from the manufacturer with records in front of the book. I would not recommend putting the book in front of the records under any circumstances. The stereo book is more than twice the size of the mono book, and it weighs quite a bit more as a result, so it’s not worth damaging the records to re-organize your box to put the book at the front. The records are organized chronologically inside the box. The box itself opens from the top, with the lid remaining attached to the box. Each of the boxes, not just either the mono or stereo box, has a slip case cover. It’s not much, but there is a thin sleeve than slides over the top of the box, which is purely for hype/promo as it advertises the contents of the respective box on the back.

Regarding the book, it’s easily worth $40-50. It’s much nicer than the book that comes with the mono box set. While they both have similar content, the sheer size of the stereo book compared to the mono book, 252 pages to 108 pages, makes it better. But that fact aside, the stereo book has more detailed info, some different photos. Because of the size, the stereo book goes more in depth for each album, dedicating multiple pages to each. While the mono book only has 1 or 2 pages per album with actual information, the stereo book has around 4 pages of info and a couple of photos from the era. The cover is embossed, and has more detailed imagery on the both the front and back cover than the mono book. It seems like the mono book was meant to be more of a photo book than a legitimate book, while the stereo book is both. It has plenty of photos and lots of information.

Because it’s been quite a few years since these box sets came out, especially the stereo box (2012), prices are starting to drastically fall. As mentioned earlier in the entry, the original price for the stereo box was $450, coming out to roughly $32 per album without factoring in the price of the book or the box the records come in, which is an arbitrary price determined by the owner of the box. That original retail price falls in line with records being overpriced for a multitude of reasons. And they sold a good chunk of box sets when they first came out because there was a lot of hype around them, and plenty of demand too. But many boxes are still lingering to this day, though I’m not sure if they just kept on pressing them over the years.

I bought one copy of each of the box sets for a little under $135 shipped apiece. As mentioned earlier, I bought them from a horrible merch company that is based in the UK but ships North America orders out of Canada, and paid in Canadian Dollars, so the exchange rate was very much on my side. This was back in February 2017 during a ridiculous 50% off sale this merch company was running on box sets, and tack on an additional 15% off coupon code, and you wind up getting a $400+ box set for $132.50. That deal gets even sweeter after you factor in that price for the book, along with the actual box itself, which makes the price of each record come down to a ludicrous amount. This entry is running so long and I’m running out of unique adjectives to describe things. The records were already at $14 a piece before factoring in the box, let alone the book. If you take the low end of the book, $40, and add in $10 for the box, each record in the box set comes out to an astoundingly low $6.08.

My only gripe about both of these box sets, not just the mono or stereo box, is that neither of them comes with download cards/codes. You think they would, especially in this day and age, but Apple Records / the surviving Beatles are notoriously greedy, and sadly it’s not surprising that they would want to make as much money as possible off these re-masters. And they somewhat succeed with that philosophy as you would have to buy their entire catalog again, either the digital downloads or the CD’s, in order to have the best quality MP3s of the songs. It’s a lame move on any label’s part, but since The Beatles were really taken advantage of earlier in their career when the rights to their music were literally sold out from underneath them, the tiniest bit of slack should be cut for them. The rights to The Beatles catalog was sold to Michael Jackson of all people. Figures that the one person who has/had more money than the Beatles, outbid them, for the rights to their own music.